Banned a trustee?

stepson;11155 wrote: Because Stan, you are the current president, and administrator, and the person who could "fix" it, if need be. That's why I asked you specifically.

An erroneous presumption on your part, where you made it about "me". The actions were requested by Malcolm and taken by Austin. Those are clearly the people who would be involved in any "fixing" needed. Implying I needed to be involved relies on the presumption that the moderation was not reasonably performed.

Rather than making a presumption of possible fault, you could simply have asked, as others did, what happened.

KilnRed;11170 wrote: Okay, well again, I guess we can agree to disagree and have considered your input. Consider the amount of immaturity that one must have to publicly state they're discontinuing their participation though. Why not just leave, Jarrod? Is it necessary to tell the masses. One might make the assessment that this action is consistent with that of a child, acting out in this way. Some call this being a "cry baby." If you wish to make your separation public and out of frustration, a moderator can/will see to it that your reinstatement is also public. They'll be no sneaking back in..

Consider the mindset of a person who asks to have his posts deleted, says he is leaving, and then goes to another forum and states he was banned.

Consider also the mindset of that same person who then watches the topic at both forums presumptuously disparage the person they suspect did the banning.

I would suggest this provides further insight into the mindset of a prior moderator of this forum.

Apparently a moderator on that other forum recognized how inappropriate the topic was, and deleted it.

Brad & Austin,
Points for clarification ---
1) Who removed Malcolm’s Moderator rights?
2) I find the statement by Stan Shaw in post #22 “President Wannabe” to be very discourteous and inflammatory. As the mod on Rennlist felt the quoted statement and thread were not appropriate he deleted all. I ask why the moderators here have not taken the same action with regards to Stan’s equally bad statement or are you prevented from doing that by admin (in this case Stan)
Thanks,
Roger

Roger Tyson;11184 wrote: BStan’s equally bad statement or are you prevented from doing that by admin (in this case Stan)
Thanks,
Roger

We both agree it is a bad statement.
It was made by *your* presidential candidate.
I just provided it, so others might understand something more of him.

Always interesting to see you try to manipulate behavior. Rather than ask the moderators to take action, you use innuendo to imply that perhaps the admin is preventing them from acting. Thus questioning their and my integrity. As usual without a thread of evidence.

Roger Tyson;11184 wrote: Brad & Austin,
Points for clarification ---
1) Who removed Malcolm’s Moderator rights?
2) I find the statement by Stan Shaw in post #22 “President Wannabe” to be very discourteous and inflammatory. As the mod on Rennlist felt the quoted statement and thread were not appropriate he deleted all. I ask why the moderators here have not taken the same action with regards to Stan’s equally bad statement or are you prevented from doing that by admin (in this case Stan)
Thanks,
Roger

Roger,

As stated earlier in this thread, the admin is the only one who has the authority to name or remove moderator privileges. I will remove the quote by Stan from the other forum.

I see this is a pretty passionate group. I look forward to see all the good stuff that passion can do when put in to group events etc!